Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi LapBook Plus (all builds)
Motherboard	eii A116J-1
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '19 at 08:14
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	66%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom E3950 176 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 39.9 2-Core 76.1 29% 49.7 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 116 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6890 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	2.72% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 2.69 2% 3.11 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 3.03 Splatting 5.3 3% 4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.72% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0412A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 268 114 85 85 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 327 Write 299 Mixed 266 SusWrite 155 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 1.2 28% 8.27 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 18.4 DQ Mixed 14.3 30% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 8.5 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom E3950IntelBench 28%, 176 samples	5x

GPU
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	5x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	3x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x
WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TBWDCBench 101%, 5,778 samples	1x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16