PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130806 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 14 '19 at 20:13 |
Run Duration | 231 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
|
32.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 269 314 299 338 303 MB/s
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
565GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 139 138 139 130 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 61 62 62 62 57 MB/s
|
34.6%
Below average
|
|||
Wilk 8GB
6GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 2.1 2.2 3.4 3.8 4.2 MB/s
|
4.19%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 KHX1600C10D3/ 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 229x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 224x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 146x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 47x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 46x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $645 |