| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V GEN3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121109 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '19 at 17:18 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Extreme |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.7%
Above average
|
66% 140 Pts
|
51% 408 Pts
|
35% 527 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Asus(1043 83A0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
1.97%
Terrible
|
2% 4.2 fps
|
2% 5.97 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 23 18 16 19 7.7 MB/s
|
74.5%
Very good
|
39% 181 MB/s
|
137% 50.5 MB/s
|
94% 194 MB/s
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 2,808 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 64%, 112,215 samples | 996x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $145Bench 63%, 87,254 samples | 721x |
| Core i7-2700KIntel $296Bench 64%, 11,435 samples | 221x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $399Bench 52%, 512,504 samples | 293x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $280Bench 57%, 752,541 samples | 220x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $415Bench 78%, 677,712 samples | 165x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $700 |