Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory18.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191108
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 21:49
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 268
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 827
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,350
84% 1,350 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Asus(1043 8706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.1% Very good
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 95.9
73% 91.8 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 82.5
Splatting 73
71% 89.4 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 766 735 850 729 758 760 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,358
Write 917
Mixed 956
SusWrite 766
223% 999 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 48.4
153% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,302
DQ Write 1,115
DQ Mixed 1,208
905% 1,208 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 202%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
91GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 241 235 229 224 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 272
Write 257
Mixed 205
SusWrite 233
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 22.6
76% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 124%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
393GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 83.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 88.6
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
478GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 135 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 116
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 136
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.7% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 39.8
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 36.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback