Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-V (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120625
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '16 at 22:06
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 94.8 2-Core 188 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 367 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz) 8,807 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 844D) 2.2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3347 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.58% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 1.91 2% 3.02 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 5.26 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.58% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 480GB 804 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.28 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 117 165189219 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 -44375602071586 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 84 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 24 (B1) Unknown 0 0 11 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 165189219 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 165189219 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 165189219 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 35178 (EA) Unknown 0 0 29869 (F1) Unknown 0 0 29869 (F2) Unknown 0 0 24201	25.8% Poor	Read 151 Write 111 Mixed 166 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 12.1 4K Mixed 9.3 40% 12 MB/s	DQ Read 19.8 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 8.77 9% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 41%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 734GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 9 (03) Spinup time 169 164 6525 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10816 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 36 36 46761 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 195 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 581 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 141 141 179199 (C2) HDA temperature 132 112 18 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	40.1% Average	Read 66.7 Write 73.2 Mixed 22.7 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.12 50% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 724GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 174 172 4275 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2142 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11045 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 19 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2139 (C2) HDA temperature 126 110 21 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	67.1% Good	Read 118 Write 116 Mixed 73.9 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.28 4K Write 2.49 4K Mixed 0.39 143% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 76%
WD Ext HDD 1021 2.5TB 317 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 592GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 24.2 Mixed 26.6 34% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.05 4K Mixed 0.17 44% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 3,471 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 19.5 MC Mixed 17 52% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 16.2 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	65x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	58x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	24x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBRL Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 Kingston 9905413-025.A00LF Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A-H9 10GBUnknownBench 43%, 16 samples	8x
M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 830B M2F4G64CB88C7N-DI Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 50%, 8 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $333

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16