| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
| Motherboard | Asus P5QL PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20090701 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 26 '19 at 19:51 |
| Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E7400-$130
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
39.3%
Below average
|
40% 60.6 Pts
|
10% 77.7 Pts
|
5% 78.2 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO-512
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
|
2.7%
Terrible
|
3% 3.05 fps
|
3% 3.18 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SSD 240GB 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 86 16 5.9 37 16 MB/s
|
24%
Poor
|
42% 186 MB/s
|
39% 9.47 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
260GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 113 116 114 MB/s
|
67.5%
Good
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
170% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
USB Flash DISK 64GB
58GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 3.6 2.4 4.6 3.8 4.3 MB/s
|
3.96%
Terrible
|
11% 9.75 MB/s
|
10% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.9%
Very poor
|
16% 5.63 GB/s
|
15% 5.23 GB/s
|
36% 112 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 43x |
| Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 28x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 20x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $209 |