Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 115% UFO	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 105% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP (all builds)
Memory	19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '19 at 02:47
Run Duration	295 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.5 1-Core 137 2-Core 273 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 516 8-Core 837 83% 676 Pts	64-Core 1,081 67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6696) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 166 Reflection 177 Parallax 158 135% 167 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 168 Splatting 122 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,455 Write 1475 Mixed 1,273 382% 1,734 MB/s	4K Read 63.4 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 80.4 284% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 979 DQ Write 1,134 DQ Mixed 1,011 774% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Plextor M6S 512GB-$189 93 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 12GB free Firmware: 1.08 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 392 Write 380 Mixed 218 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 29.3 113% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 99.6 79% 111 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 7GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 21 21 19 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 24 Write 17 Mixed 16 SusWrite 18.3 14% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 51% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 62%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 86GB free Firmware: AX001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 84 78 85 82 78 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 78.8 Write 76.3 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 80.1 47% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 85GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 63 70 73 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 75.8 Write 80.7 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 67.5 48% 65.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 49% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 85%
Seagate ST31000525SV 1TB-$155 2,311 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1GB free Firmware: CV12 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 21.3 Write 25 Mixed 22.5 17% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 56GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 37 44 38 42 44 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 84.3 Write 76.7 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 41.9 42% 57.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 6GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 39 35 40 33 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 67 Write 53.5 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 33.3 39% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 68%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 3GB free Firmware: 02.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 66.2 Write 98.5 Mixed 62.3 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 40GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 48 46 48 47 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 68.7 Mixed 49 SusWrite 43 38% 51.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 84%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$85 3,058 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 92GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 36 39 34 37 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 98.2 Write 98.7 Mixed 46 SusWrite 38.9 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 110%
Freecom USB Memory 250GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 10GB free, PID fc9e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 31 30 27 28 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 30 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 29.4 37% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 41% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 15%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 5GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 15 16 16 16 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 41.2 Write 16 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 16 25% 21.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.7 65% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 29.8 102% 35.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 42.4 SC Mixed 29.6 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 55.5 72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	178x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	44x
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	26x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	24x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	24x
MEMPEK1W032GA 29GBIntelBench 263%, 1,656 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	15x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	24x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	23x
AR32C16S8K2SU416R 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 3,827 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $827

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16