Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 16:13
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 595
8-Core 1,172
104% 883 Pts
64-Core 1,642
102% 1,642 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 69.2
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 95.5
56% 78.3 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 55.6
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 47 42 36 35 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 455
Write 386
Mixed 360
SusWrite 51.3
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 1.3
66% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 22.8
DQ Mixed 17.9
32% 67 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 91%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
73GB free
Firmware: CS900211
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 234 236 235 253 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 384
Write 200
Mixed 308
SusWrite 260
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 24.5
123% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 138
136% 211 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 91%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
216GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 105 103 106 103 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 438
Write 311
Mixed 348
SusWrite 157
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 38.7
154% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 218
191% 284 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 91%
Fujitsu MJA2250BH G2 250GB
14GB free
Firmware: 00000018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 56 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 50.7
Write 45.3
Mixed 32
SusWrite 57.2
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31%
Great: 46%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
13GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 11 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30% Below average
Read 124
Write 40.5
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 15.3
66% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.7
228% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 24
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 24.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 5-CF Builds (Compare 3,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5 - $226

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,030
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback