MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results


Gaming 138% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 161% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C36
Motherboard	MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) (all builds)
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '19 at 02:06
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 67.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 302 90% 173 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1,121 102% 859 Pts	64-Core 2,190 136% 2,190 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.23 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	155% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 231 Parallax 222 176% 223 fps	MRender 252 Gravity 206 Splatting 131 154% 196 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 502 496 483 469 469 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1,974 Write 942 Mixed 704 SusWrite 506 227% 1,032 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 46.5 173% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 808 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 310 278% 440 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 182GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 197 199 198 198 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 370 Write 364 Mixed 329 SusWrite 195 71% 314 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 45.1 146% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 209 157% 210 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 114GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 391 414 423 424 414 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 489 Write 435 Mixed 390 SusWrite 403 97% 429 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 48.2 156% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 185 139% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 134%
Kingston SEDC400S37960G 960GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 195GB free Firmware: SAFM32.F SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 189 196 198 199 198 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 364 Write 366 Mixed 286 SusWrite 194 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 56.5 4K Mixed 32.6 112% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 148 130% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 111%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 729GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 98 100 97 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 88.7 Mixed 76.6 SusWrite 97.8 68% 91.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 76%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 342 350 352 352 351 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.8% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 27 80% 27.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 24.9 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 183%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 209%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	97x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	70x
Ryzen 9 3950XAMD $506Bench 89%, 50,170 samples	55x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	46x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	34x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	31x

SSD
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	26x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	25x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	17x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	19x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 2,149 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $1,801

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16