Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Quad-Core Processor (up to 1.4GHz) 925 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Memory 42.1 1-Core 13.3 2-Core 26.2 20% 27.2 Pts	4-Core 50.6 8-Core 56.3 7% 53.4 Pts	64-Core 51.1 3% 51.1 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8250 1,387 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C730) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.54% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 3.35 Parallax 2.28 1% 2.46 fps	MRender 2.14 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.54% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 2,350 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT41K0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 115 112 114 117 117 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 379 Write 117 Mixed 112 SusWrite 113 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 18.3 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 15.4 62% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 121 DQ Write 90.4 DQ Mixed 49.5 52% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 1.1 5% 1.7 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Processor (up to 1.4GHz)Quad-CoreBench 22%, 925 samples	27x

GPU
HD 8250AMDBench 1%, 1,387 samples	27x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	21x
PM851 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 2,513 samples	3x
LMT-256M6M 256GBLiteonitBench 77%, 528 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	23x
EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 1x4GBMicronBench 11%, 90 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16