PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MICRO-STAR 760GM-E51 |
Motherboard | MSI 760GM -E51 (MS-7596) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101224 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 13 '19 at 08:59 |
Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Athlon II X4 630
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 149 162 159 184 MB/s
|
82.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
195GB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 110 111 111 112 MB/s
|
66.2%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 6x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 5x |
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 4x |
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $232 |