PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Microelectronics G225 (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASRock B360 Pro4 |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190422 |
Uptime | 4.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '19 at 08:01 |
Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 46% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 317 355 308 314 322 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 115x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 1x |
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 92x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 7x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 3x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GBWDCBench 93%, 43,498 samples | 53x |
WDS500G2B0B 500GBWDCBench 96%, 11,733 samples | 21x |
MX500 2TBCrucial $130Bench 108%, 44,787 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 121% - Outstanding | Total price: $238 |