Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140225
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '19 at 20:02
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 96 2-Core 192 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 371 49% 368 Pts	64-Core 344 21% 344 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 047B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.27 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.18 fps	MRender 1.76 Gravity 1.6 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.74 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 38 75 73 83 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	41.3% Average	Read 76.7 Write 71 Mixed 52 SusWrite 67.1 49% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 187GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27.3 Mixed 20 SusWrite 18.9 32% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 113GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 27 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 19 32% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.7 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	198x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	150x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	139x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	149x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	90x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	72x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	68x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	53x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	27x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16