Asrock X99 OC Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X99 OC Formula  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 23:49
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 199
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 595
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 62.4
40% 48.5 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 41.6
34% 41.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 247 267 275 203 257 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 456
Write 278
Mixed 185
SusWrite 244
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 29.9
115% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 76.1
121% 234 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
407GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 316 258 257 271 273 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 442
Mixed 404
SusWrite 300
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 46.9
158% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 238
209% 312 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 147 149 148 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 144
Mixed 82
SusWrite 147
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
208% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$78
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.1% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 OC Formula Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 OC Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $575
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback