Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '19 at 05:00
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 65.8 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 116 52% 85.5 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 572 46% 403 Pts	64-Core 1,071 66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2067) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.7% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 114 Parallax 117 85% 112 fps	MRender 138 Gravity 99.8 Splatting 82.9 85% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: S5Z42102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 835 712 478 533 625 471 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	185% Outstanding	Read 1,572 Write 1026 Mixed 153 SusWrite 609 185% 840 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 52.2 180% 57.7 MB/s	DQ Read 673 DQ Write 621 DQ Mixed 344 341% 546 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 185% Great: 277%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB 77,062 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 830GB free Firmware: S5Z42102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 898 949 886 540 497 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,528 Write 927 Mixed 106 SusWrite 749 182% 828 MB/s	4K Read 44.6 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 53.7 180% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 675 DQ Write 430 DQ Mixed 418 348% 508 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 311%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 2x8GB 2,724 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.9% Good	MC Read 29 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 26.5 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 23.1 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,409x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $929

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16