Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 19:49
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 283
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 812
79% 647 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gainward(10B0 1B06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 192
Parallax 184
126% 177 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 175
Splatting 127
116% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,782
Write 1096
Mixed 464
244% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 46
188% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1175
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 828
669% 952 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
122GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 470 473 484 472 335 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 469
Mixed 393
SusWrite 446
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 60.1
195% 69.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
87GB free
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 562 475 437 411 386 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 1,068
Mixed 663
SusWrite 518
200% 896 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 64
240% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1210
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 846
730% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 211%
Great: 254%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100
220GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 449 429 449 439 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 442
Mixed 375
SusWrite 434
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 40.7
151% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 343
257% 341 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Sandisk S-2T00 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 463 452 476 468 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 489
Mixed 383
SusWrite 468
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 53.3
188% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 247
212% 314 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 122%
Great: 120%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
421GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 108 108 108 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 111
Write 101
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 107
71% 97 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.5% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.8
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 28.5
SC Mixed 24.4
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $992
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback