Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H97-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '20 at 13:13
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 129 65% 102 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 147 22% 157 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 79.7 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 78.1 65% 77 fps	MRender 67.7 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 55.2 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 62%
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.71% Terrible	Lighting 2.8 Reflection 3.88 Parallax 4.22 2% 3.63 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 5.39 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.71% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 149 109 111 89 80 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 452 Mixed 364 SusWrite 149 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 60.2 198% 71 MB/s	DQ Read 361 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 326 249% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 31GB free Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 119 85 75 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 427 Write 120 Mixed 138 SusWrite 100 43% 196 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 20.4 116% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 50.2 84% 168 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 73%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 416GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 60 63 61 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 68.5 Write 77 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 61.4 48% 64.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 6,017 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 230GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 84 85 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 83 Write 90.5 Mixed 34.5 SusWrite 84.7 98% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.5% Below average	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.1 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 11.5 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 59.1 68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H97-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 1,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	283x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	169x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	152x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	151x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	129x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	86x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	39x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	32x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	31x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	88x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	68x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	38x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16