PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H110M-P (all builds) |
Memory | 5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191021 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 04 '20 at 05:00 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | COL-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Zotac(19DA 3255) 3GB
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$31
112GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 272 85 87 85 87 MB/s
|
88.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Fujitsu MJA2160BH FFS G1 160GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00810020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 53 49 53 54 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FAD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
40.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 96x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 68x |
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 53x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 84x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $138 |