PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7400 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0RW199 |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20120430 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '16 at 15:31 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
CPU, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
|
47.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
79.1%
Very good
|
||||
WD Elements 2TB
198GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
16.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 8 slots used
8GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54721stBench 48%, 256 samples | 20x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54401stBench 46%, 452 samples | 13x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54821stBench 49%, 298 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples | 11x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |