Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 61,910 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 31.9 1-Core 59.7 2-Core 132 39% 74.4 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 320 34% 273 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Acer(1025 1233) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Lighting 5.43 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 8.03 4% 6.41 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 6.74 4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30001P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 249 243 244 250 247 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 353 Write 242 Mixed 197 SusWrite 247 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 16.3 60% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 142 109% 148 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x4GB 8,423 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 1333 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 19 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 11 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16