Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '20 at 21:05
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 147
2-Core 294
98% 179 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 811
84% 674 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 84.2
0% 50.8 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 56.8
52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 192 187 195 191 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 453
Mixed 226
SusWrite 196
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 49.3
183% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 237
201% 297 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 103%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 185 184 185 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 158
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 184
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
7GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 98 101 103 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 115
Write 108
Mixed 69
SusWrite 101
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
37GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 73 74 74 74 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 65
Write 67
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 74.1
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 28.7
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 30
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,910 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $634
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback