Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	5.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '20 at 22:47
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Memory 72.9 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 884 87% 713 Pts	64-Core 1,339 83% 1,339 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 1809 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 37.5 34% 36.9 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 40 Splatting 37.3 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB 36,473 User benchmarks, average bench 198% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 657 592 406 345 421 500 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 858 Write 1,065 Mixed 1,066 SusWrite 487 196% 869 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 42.5 153% 60.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,282 DQ Write 1,016 DQ Mixed 972 776% 1,090 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 262%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 42GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 310 306 342 355 224 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 342 Write 268 Mixed 312 SusWrite 298 69% 305 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 32.7 104% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 183 142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 123%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 682GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 131 131 135 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 127 Write 124 Mixed 23 SusWrite 133 73% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESB.M16FE 2x16GB 3,387 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.2% Above average	MC Read 19.2 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 17.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 16.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 94.8 42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 137%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	913x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	698x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $1,196

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16