Lenovo 20BFS05U00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20BFS05U00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFS05U00
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '20 at 01:07
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 190
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 276
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M
Legend(17AA 2211) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 4
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4.48
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LS2i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 106 114 127 116 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 368
Write 96.2
Mixed 153
SusWrite 115
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 16.9
65% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 70.3
60% 89.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback