Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-S2H V2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181016
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '20 at 19:24
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 78.8 1-Core 119 2-Core 218 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 668 70% 564 Pts	64-Core 936 58% 936 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22FC) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 91.6 54% 76.2 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 57.3 54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40 10,318 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1115D0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 212 210 80 89 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 1,268 Write 502 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 156 105% 487 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 3 67% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 612 DQ Write 615 DQ Mixed 544 428% 591 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 248%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 211GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 77 76 77 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 71.2 Write 74.7 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 76.1 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB 4,888 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	MC Read 36.6 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 30.5 92% 32.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 33.6 SC Mixed 25.6 78% 27.3 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	213x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	190x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	159x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	112x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	98x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	85x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	79x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	41x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	31x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	32x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $317

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16