Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0 3,589 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 74 2-Core 146 60% 99.6 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 275 38% 280 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Lighting 26.3 Reflection 24.3 Parallax 32.6 21% 27.7 fps	MRender 36.2 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 22.7 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q256G1001 256GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2180001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 311 350 363 371 375 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 417 Write 369 Mixed 237 SusWrite 350 77% 343 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 26.5 93% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 145 147% 240 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 398GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 403 434 437 433 436 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 466 Write 442 Mixed 385 SusWrite 426 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 43.5 144% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 358 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 744GB free Firmware: 1A02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 172 Write 176 Mixed 110 113% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 563GB free Firmware: 1A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 84.1 Write 80.9 Mixed 49.3 53% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.9% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 24.2 72% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 148%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	495x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	304x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	183x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16