Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 16 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 90
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 97.3
53% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 285
29% 233 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 56
Parallax 48.8
49% 55 fps
MRender 45
Gravity 52.9
Splatting 42.8
38% 46.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
R5SL240G 240GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 98 7.8 111 89 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.5% Poor
Read 357
Write 269
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 63.5
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
28% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
833GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 86 10 128 71 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 116
Write 108
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 67.3
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
146GB free
Firmware: ZM100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 61 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 56.9
Write 63.4
Mixed 42
SusWrite 60.6
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 33%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
490GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 94 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50% Average
Read 80.2
Write 86.3
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 93.8
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5403-002.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-002.A00LF 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback