Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 19:13
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 301
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 890
93% 744 Pts
64-Core 887
55% 887 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Asus(1043 872C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 89.2
Parallax 84.8
81% 91 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 78.5
74% 93 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 555 271 267 262 263 263 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,838
Write 1,428
Mixed 527
SusWrite 314
227% 1,027 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 56.8
239% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,094
DQ Write 1,240
DQ Mixed 780
694% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 217%
Great: 236%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1510 1262 1260 1264 1263 1259 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
367% Outstanding
Read 2,455
Write 2,140
Mixed 1,449
SusWrite 1303
411% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 101
346% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1931
DQ Write 1,750
DQ Mixed 1,738
1,332% 1,806 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 367%
Great: 372%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
222GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10,490
Write 8,916
Mixed 9,334
2,135% 9,580 MB/s
4K Read 826
4K Write 313
4K Mixed 441
1,983% 527 MB/s
DQ Read 2,273
DQ Write 1,631
DQ Mixed 1745
1,360% 1,883 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
1TB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 114 118 117 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 63.3
Write 72
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 117
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 30
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 28.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback