Asrock H77M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock H77M  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '20 at 00:29
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$190
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.7% Very good
1-Core 107
2-Core 201
73% 154 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 521
61% 463 Pts
64-Core 532
36% 532 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 140
Reflection 85
Parallax 126
37% 117 fps
MRender 79.9
Gravity 130
Splatting 87.6
35% 99.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 5,541
Write 5,137
Mixed 5,233
1,184% 5,304 MB/s
4K Read 386
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 268
1,046% 292 MB/s
DQ Read 935
DQ Write 623
DQ Mixed 731
558% 763 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$106
466GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 840 863 842 820 822 820 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,182
Write 966
Mixed 990
SusWrite 835
223% 993 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 63.1
219% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 730
DQ Mixed 758
571% 763 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 200%
Great: 334%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
406GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 30.1
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 26.5
7% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 8.5
27% 8.03 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
84GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 117
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$160
931GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 94 95 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 97
Write 50.9
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 94.6
57% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H77M Builds (Compare 1,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H77M - $186

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $707
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback