Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181104
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '20 at 09:53
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 76.3 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 433 8-Core 429 58% 431 Pts	64-Core 427 26% 427 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU) 85,536 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 876B) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.10.16 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.1 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 15.6 11% 13.4 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 14 Splatting 17.9 11% 12.6 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-480-G2 480GB 1,425 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1029A SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 367 398 424 422 424 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 467 Write 414 Mixed 351 SusWrite 396 92% 407 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 76.5 4K Mixed 25.1 118% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 34.6 70% 139 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 93%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 80GB free Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 87 90 92 96 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 440 Write 247 Mixed 141 SusWrite 90.2 50% 230 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 18.8 76% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 76.7 DQ Mixed 41.1 46% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 7.6 7.8 8 7.5 7.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	7.87% Terrible	Read 25.8 Write 7.3 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 7.9 15% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1.1 71% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.87% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.3% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 14.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,461x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,304x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,006x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	949x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	734x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	653x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	715x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	339x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	284x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $322

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16