Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X CODE (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181105
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 131 2-Core 250 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 714 71% 577 Pts	64-Core 903 56% 903 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.7% Poor	Lighting 24.9 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 27.2 20% 22.8 fps	MRender 37.8 Gravity 39.1 Splatting 44.1 34% 40.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 141 139 139 137 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 410 Mixed 331 SusWrite 172 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 44.6 153% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 357 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 124%
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB 11,733 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 22GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 198 184 161 182 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 426 Write 336 Mixed 228 SusWrite 207 67% 299 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 30.7 91% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 180 183% 296 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 672GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 163 163 162 163 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Read 118 Write 96.5 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 162 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB 9,834 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.6% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 26.6 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 20.9 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	83x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	82x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	74x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	97x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	45x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	22x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $841

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16