MSI H310-F PRO (MS-7B25)

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B25
Motherboard	MSI H310-F PRO (MS-7B25) (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190222
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '20 at 22:27
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 128 2-Core 259 89% 160 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 755 78% 629 Pts	64-Core 752 46% 752 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% EVGA(3842 1167) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Lighting 96.3 Reflection 84.2 Parallax 72.8 78% 84.5 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 78.4 Splatting 75.9 61% 74.7 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 9.5 15 38 113 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 442 Write 362 Mixed 296 SusWrite 59.3 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 42.2 4K Mixed 13.1 54% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 78.8 DQ Write 8.3 DQ Mixed 29.4 25% 38.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 58%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 326GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 123 124 122 123 122 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 152 Write 133 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 121 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 79%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 19GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 7.8 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	7.71% Terrible	Read 24.8 Write 2.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 8.8 11% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.71% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD48G240081 2x8GB 3,770 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	82% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 23.1 83% 28.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 32.3 SC Mixed 24.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310-F PRO (MS-7B25) Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310-F PRO (MS-7B25)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	159x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	37x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	23x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	63x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	48x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
SD9SB8W128G 128GBSandiskBench 77%, 279 samples	9x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	9x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
PSD48G240081 2x8GBPatriotBench 75%, 3,770 samples	20x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GBUnknownBench 75%, 25,824 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $454

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16