| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191113 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 02 '20 at 08:33 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
78.1%
Very good
|
74% 131 Pts
|
71% 590 Pts
|
65% 1,044 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
|
31.9%
Below average
|
32% 36.3 fps
|
31% 38 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2311006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 303 309 315 323 323 MB/s
|
79.2%
Very good
|
75% 336 MB/s
|
109% 44.5 MB/s
|
101% 171 MB/s
|
|
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
931GB free
Firmware: JP4OA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 129 132 132 131 132 MB/s
|
74.7%
Very good
|
83% 114 MB/s
|
159% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
88.7%
Excellent
|
91% 31.8 GB/s
|
81% 28.3 GB/s
|
48% 83.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,984 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 867x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 715x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 402x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $358 |