| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 23.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1680x1050x4294967296 szín |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120304 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 09 '20 at 16:45 |
| Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
| Run User | HUN-User |
| Background CPU | 31% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.5%
Good
|
57% 89.7 Pts
|
32% 255 Pts
|
22% 350 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.4%
Above average
|
54% 71.7 fps
|
52% 63.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 127 119 117 103 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
22% 96.4 MB/s
|
40% 13 MB/s
|
32% 31.1 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
443GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 127 128 128 128 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
79% 108 MB/s
|
148% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Sony Storage Media 8GB
5GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3 3.1 3 3.1 3 MB/s
|
3.15%
Terrible
|
5% 4.97 MB/s
|
12% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
38.2%
Below average
|
37% 12.9 GB/s
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
63% 63.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,571 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 712x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 278x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 263x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 616x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |