Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics71.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration267 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,490
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
90% 190 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 1,009
91% 746 Pts
64-Core 2,590
174% 2,590 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$399
EVGA(3842 5170) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Lighting 279
Reflection 277
Parallax 307
73% 287 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 260
Splatting 207
72% 219 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$197
710GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1864 1869 1268 1006 1009 1011 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 1,851
Mixed 1,275
SusWrite 1,338
358% 1,597 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 67.9
265% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,369
DQ Write 1,161
DQ Mixed 1,269
950% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 212%
This bench: 296%
Great: 362%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 411030RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 445 441 438 435 434 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 413
Write 386
Mixed 353
SusWrite 442
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 32.8
120% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 244
210% 310 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$334
1TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 445 441 439 436 435 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 404
Mixed 376
SusWrite 443
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 40.9
144% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 105%
Great: 134%
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 930 922 826 763 687 627 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$74
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 135 137 135 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 161
Write 84.5
Mixed 79
SusWrite 135
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 84%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
196GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 36 36 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 113
Write 66.8
Mixed 53
SusWrite 33.7
80% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 20.9
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 3,250 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,372
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback