Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Foxconn nT-A3000 series (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN nT-A3000 series
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111229
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '20 at 22:00
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 52.5 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 39.1 27% 37.4 Pts	4-Core 39.2 8-Core 38.9 5% 39.1 Pts	64-Core 38.6 2% 38.6 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320 8,182 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(105B 0E29) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.53 1% 1.5 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.39 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 40GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 31 32 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Read 119 Write 42 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 33.1 14% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 8.8 33% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 88.2 DQ Write 45.7 DQ Mixed 59.2 46% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU6C2303EP0200 1x2GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 16%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 14%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 28%, 299 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples	1x

SSD
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 19%, 2,491 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16