Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190919
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 119 2-Core 234 77% 141 Pts	4-Core 366 8-Core 592 59% 479 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.4% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 46.2 Parallax 37.5 33% 41.2 fps	MRender 57.1 Gravity 40 Splatting 52.2 41% 49.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 291 259 256 245 253 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 699 Write 235 Mixed 403 SusWrite 262 88% 400 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 53.1 175% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 593 DQ Write 403 DQ Mixed 490 368% 495 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 187%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 205GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 261 309 276 283 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	Read 165 Write 98.3 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 288 36% 158 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 10.4 44% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 14.5 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD Kingston 9905700-011.A00G 16GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 27.1 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 23.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 98.5 41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	493x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	301x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16