Asus P8H61-M EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M EVO  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 09:44
Run Duration332 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 161
72% 118 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 413
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 33.7
Parallax 48.7
28% 39.1 fps
MRender 40.8
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 28.7
29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$47
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 162 173 163 178 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 324
Write 214
Mixed 148
SusWrite 165
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 26.8
87% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 148
120% 170 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 105%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
43GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 146 129 153 162 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 296
Write 173
Mixed 201
SusWrite 147
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 26.6
91% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 171
131% 180 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
45GB free
Firmware: 3.AAG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 68
Write 50
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 72.1
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
613GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 110 112 113 112 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 186
Write 44.3
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 109
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11.8
8% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
48% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M EVO Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback