Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	54 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '20 at 10:04
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Memory 96.3 1-Core 136 2-Core 230 89% 154 Pts	4-Core 531 8-Core 838 84% 685 Pts	64-Core 1,047 65% 1,047 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.1% Above average	Lighting 71.1 Reflection 72 Parallax 61.8 58% 68.3 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 68.8 56% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1125 1110 1115 1116 1095 1152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 1222 Write 1,080 Mixed 692 SusWrite 1,119 231% 1028 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 67.2 206% 73.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,174 DQ Write 845 DQ Mixed 983 742% 1,001 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 342GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 446 450 450 446 298 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 452 Mixed 436 SusWrite 423 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 51.1 166% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 353 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 440 443 443 443 451 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 456 Mixed 384 SusWrite 444 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 87.9 4K Mixed 50.7 170% 59.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 355 267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 134%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 402GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 398 396 396 397 397 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 399 Write 146 Mixed 367 SusWrite 397 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 28.3 94% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 191 140% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 99%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 217 221 228 225 225 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 6TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 219 221 225 224 223 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$184 125 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7TB free Firmware: AV01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 237 242 240 243 242 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 89%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$176 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 220 224 231 228 229 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$143 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 40.2 MC Write 43 MC Mixed 34.4 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.2 SC Write 46.9 SC Mixed 32.6 97% 33.9 GB/s	Latency 53 76% 53 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $440

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,856x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,606x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	554x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1,302x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	649x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	640x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	856x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	565x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	487x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	288x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	278x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	254x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16