Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8592
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191105
Uptime10.7 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '20 at 09:06
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 138
2-Core 266
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 784
75% 621 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8592) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.04% Terrible
Lighting 7.57
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 8.06
6% 8.49 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 15.1
9% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.04%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1708 945 588 599 601 599 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2162
Write 1,580
Mixed 1,252
SusWrite 840
325% 1,459 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 66.1
190% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,242
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 1,070
812% 1,098 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 248%
Great: 295%
Goreche Nvme 500GB
448GB free
Firmware: 0204 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 105 109 142 106 79 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
Read 784
Write 690
Mixed 622
SusWrite 102
123% 550 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 21
85% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 20.9
59% 126 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.7 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 6
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.7
10% 8.73 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.6
116% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.3
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback