Casper NIRVANA NB C400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB C400  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C400 HU 001
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 12:25
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 104
51% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 167
8-Core 156
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 164
10% 164 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Intel(8086 1616) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 5.53
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 6.35
4% 4.61 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 67 70 69 70 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 413
Write 213
Mixed 285
SusWrite 94.8
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 28.3
111% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 191
156% 221 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback