Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705GE
Memory6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '20 at 15:10
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 47.6
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 150
53% 95.2 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 415
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1B3E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 10.3
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 17.6
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 17
14% 16.7 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 16.8
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80001C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 132 129 127 127 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 287
Write 144
Mixed 206
SusWrite 129
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 24.9
91% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 31.6
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 36.8
38% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 129%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
749GB free
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 100 120 121 124 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 135
Write 147
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 121
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.6
238% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 74%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 8.8
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GE_FX705GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback