Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 13:02
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 562
58% 466 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH128GCST 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTFA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 38 57 48 58 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 316
Write 115
Mixed 192
SusWrite 54.3
37% 169 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 27.5
88% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 88.6
DQ Mixed 131
119% 190 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 100%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
26GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 129 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 129
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 76%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$55
10GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 76 81 81 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
47% Average
Read 84.4
Write 79.8
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 79.2
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
272GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 85
Write 8
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 92.3
37% 51.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 61%
WD My Book 500GB
335GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 36.7
Write 36.7
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 40
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $204
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback