Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120601
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 05:06
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$350
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 95.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
84% 141 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 580
61% 475 Pts
64-Core 577
39% 577 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3606) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42% Average
Lighting 133
Reflection 108
Parallax 173
35% 138 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 153
Splatting 88.9
43% 120 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 182 116 136 125 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 401
Write 315
Mixed 328
SusWrite 163
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 26.6
94% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 176
179% 290 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$150
931GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 197 192 272 283 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 357
Write 341
Mixed 328
SusWrite 235
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 40
136% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 233
175% 234 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 135%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
56GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 175 177 84 73 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 330
Write 336
Mixed 262
SusWrite 130
59% 265 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 29.9
102% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 166
121% 156 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 20.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 54.4
74% 54.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MAXIMUS V FORMULA Builds (Compare 2,922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V FORMULA - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,254
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback