Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 21 '20 at 12:40
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 58
2-Core 117
55% 86.6 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 274
32% 247 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Gigabyte(1458 401B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.8% Above average
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 74
Parallax 76.5
64% 76.2 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 56.1
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 120GB-$82
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 190 195 184 196 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 333
Write 377
Mixed 231
SusWrite 182
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 30.3
109% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.8
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 36.9
38% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 98%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
28GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 178 175 174 177 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 286
Write 223
Mixed 197
SusWrite 173
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 34.8
121% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 44.7
40% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
855GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 175 191 195 184 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 128
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 185
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.6
444% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 14.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback