Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 11:12
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 137
62% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 416
40% 331 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 45 32 38 29 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 334
Write 47.2
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 46.7
23% 109 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 17.9
51% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 26.9
34% 64.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 70%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 270 78 78 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 446
Write 361
Mixed 341
SusWrite 158
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 41.2
137% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 196
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 121%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
605GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 125 171 172 172 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 158
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 156
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB-$99
31GB free
Firmware: FB2OC44C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 33 33 33 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 32
Write 33
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 32.7
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 35%
Fujitsu MHW2160BH PL 160GB
126GB free
Firmware: 0000001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 44.9
Write 41.7
Mixed 29
SusWrite 24.9
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 26%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB
7GB free
Firmware: 04.01G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 42.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 24.8
25% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.3
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $152
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback