Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5700HQ 14,004 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	70% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 180 59% 104 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 490 51% 411 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 80%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon IT LMT-128L9M 128GB 1,236 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: HM73001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 302 304 305 288 308 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 367 Write 283 Mixed 222 SusWrite 302 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 16 65% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 168 126% 167 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 851GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 80 83 93 87 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 84.4 Write 95.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 87.8 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GB 939 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	55.8% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 23.3 MC Mixed 21.2 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 1.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 11.8 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 81%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-5700HQIntelBench 69%, 14,004 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 5600IntelBench 4%, 7,009 samples	3x

SSD
IT LMT-128L9M 128GBLiteonBench 81%, 1,236 samples	1x
PM851 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 6,648 samples	1x

RAM
BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 62%, 939 samples	1x
TS1GSK64W6H 2x8GBTranscendBench 54%, 1,168 samples	1x
BLS8G3N18AES4.16FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 33%, 229 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16