| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140605 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 29 '20 at 14:43 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
60% 96.6 Pts
|
39% 322 Pts
|
24% 395 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.74
|
53.1%
Above average
|
55% 65.4 fps
|
49% 61.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD 256GB-$150
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 10 16 19 14 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
22% 106 MB/s
|
40% 10.6 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
215GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 203 281 294 293 294 MB/s
|
56.4%
Above average
|
59% 264 MB/s
|
76% 26.7 MB/s
|
23% 34.4 MB/s
|
|
Corsair Voyager GS 253GB
111GB free, PID 1a0d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 189 265 272 272 275 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
45.8%
Average
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
29% 10.1 GB/s
|
56% 71.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 466 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 157x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 111x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 65x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |