Asrock Z390 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 121% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '20 at 07:20
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	63%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Memory 97.4 1-Core 147 2-Core 294 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 588 8-Core 1,195 105% 891 Pts	64-Core 1,727 107% 1,727 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 13AA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.74 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	116% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 145 Parallax 146 125% 148 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 127 Splatting 104 109% 138 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 667 673 660 606 585 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 1,605 Write 1,348 Mixed 1,161 SusWrite 686 268% 1,200 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 59.8 4K Mixed 32.5 116% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,297 DQ Write 1,080 DQ Mixed 1,180 886% 1,186 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 71GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 373 361 283 275 270 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 427 Write 409 Mixed 382 SusWrite 323 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 20.1 115% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 129%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB 7,927 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2TB free Firmware: 411030RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 388 407 397 387 384 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Read 421 Write 404 Mixed 349 SusWrite 391 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 17 56% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 248 213% 314 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 118%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB 2,378 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3.5TB free Firmware: MJAOA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 161 162 162 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 169 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 162 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 92%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$94 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3TB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 177 182 179 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 194 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 179 116% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.7 215% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 111%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB 695 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 5TB free Firmware: APGNTD05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 213 206 216 216 212 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 208 Mixed 89.3 SusWrite 213 129% 177 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.7 217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 123%
Hitachi HUS724040ALA640 4TB 1,620 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3.5TB free Firmware: MFAOAA70 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 166 167 167 168 168 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 166 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 167 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB 12,538 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz Performing below potential (24^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 26.3 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 32.3 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 48.7 82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 139%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 153%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 152%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Taichi - $277

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	492x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	238x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	122x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	98x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	80x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	77x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	65x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	56x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3733 C19 2x16GBKingstonBench 103%, 1,906 samples	33x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	30x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	30x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $1,223

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16