Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 160% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 151% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190912
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '20 at 16:36
Run Duration	449 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 89 1-Core 153 2-Core 306 99% 183 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 812 89% 705 Pts	64-Core 1,394 86% 1,394 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	162% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 233 Parallax 245 180% 233 fps	MRender 275 Gravity 227 Splatting 151 171% 218 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 241GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 397 356 350 358 396 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 466 Mixed 439 SusWrite 377 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 41.4 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 45.3 150% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 169 141% 213 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 246GB free Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 381 340 337 343 380 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 455 Write 75 Mixed 382 SusWrite 361 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 38.3 124% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 16 DQ Mixed 167 131% 191 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 125%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 511GB free Firmware: X41320RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 278 247 238 235 281 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 451 Write 432 Mixed 262 SusWrite 264 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 14.7 88% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 392 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 168 142% 215 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 107%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 117GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 267 239 234 238 278 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 464 Mixed 374 SusWrite 271 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 46.5 156% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 12.5 DQ Mixed 150 121% 182 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 124%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74 6,712 User benchmarks, average bench 262% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1480 640 680 642 629 501 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	186% Outstanding	Read 1919 Write 1,858 Mixed 1,663 SusWrite 762 348% 1,550 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 11.9 119% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1266 DQ Write 69.8 DQ Mixed 28.8 182% 455 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 186% Great: 335%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 151 142 146 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 159 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 158 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 379% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 109%
SABRENT 1TB 97GB free Firmware: RKT303.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1125 884 882 665 345 365 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 731GB free Firmware: 1306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 30 29 30 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 35.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 31.5 25% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB 1,185 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 135 123 117 122 145 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 166 Write 158 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 129 166% 128 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 168% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 81%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB 5,644 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 154 149 154 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 186 Write 183 Mixed 119 SusWrite 163 218% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 4x8GB 768 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 41.2 103% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 27.8 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 39.1 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)