PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-D3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120530 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Mar 31 '20 at 21:29 |
Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
20.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 252 184 160 142 125 MB/s
|
90.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
68GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 269 256 278 264 254 MB/s
|
64.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
291GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 145 146 144 149 151 MB/s
|
85.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 89x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 61x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 52x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 32x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $465 |